Join me on a journey through cinematic offence. With 10 movies that were initially banned, and why.
Since Thomas Edison’s company presented the first-ever on-screen kiss in 1896, outrage and censorship have been ingrained in cinema. The cinematic snog featuring Vaudeville stars May Irwin and John Rice provoked reviews of being “absolutely disgusting” and suggested “police interference”.
Whilst cinematic content has come a long way to invoke such emotion, censorship is still rife across the globe. This has seen many iconic films fall victim to re-edits to meet regulations.
Let’s have a look at some others who fell foul of the sensors.
1. Zoolander (2001)
The tale of Ben Stiller’s fashion icon with a penchant for international espionage is cult classic’ personified. Initially controversial in many markets due to homoerotic themes.
It’s unfortunate timing and one offensive character in particular landed the film in hot water.
The film was one a list of movies that were banned in Malaysia. It includes the main characters being brainwashed to assassinate of the Malaysian Prime Minister. The film was referred to as “definitely unsuitable” by Malaysia and never shown.
The US originally gave the film an R rating. This was for its sexual content, profanity, and drug references. They later re-rated the movie to PG-13 following an appeal.
Zoolander was released one week after the 9/11 attacks. For a film that centres around assassinating a world leader, the global climate was not suitable for such a subject. No matter how light-hearted the film intended to be.
Created on a $28 million budget Zoolander grossed just over $45 million in the United States. This failed to meet expectations, due to the relevant subject matter. But, two decades on and the characters, dialogue and memorable moments provide a plethora of quotable moments.
2. Back To The Future (1985)
Marty and Doc’s 1980s adventure has been banned in China due to its focus on time travel. This topic has been deemed “frivolous” subject matter. Other time-hop flicks like Bill And Ted’s Excellent Adventure have also been banned.
China’s State Administration of Press may have banned this trilogy of movies. But, its cultural impact around the world stands the test of time.
3. A Clockwork Orange (1971)
Perhaps the most well-known movies to be banned.
Stanley Kubrick’s ultraviolent spectacle was adapted from the 1962 novel by Anthony Burgess. It centres around a juvenile maniac who is “treated” by intense psychological techniques. This is all following a spree of physical and sexual violence. Both the violence and nudity in Kubrick’s film led to bans across many countries. These included Ireland, South Africa, South Korea and Singapore.
Whilst not officially banned in the UK, Kubrick withdrew the movie from theatres following death threats to his family. As well as a series of crimes imitating the film took place.
The film was never officially shown again following its release in 1973 until the director’s death in 1999.
A Clockwork Orange is a cult classic because of its commentary on society and how we’re controlled. Kubrick wrote in The Saturday Review, that the film is “a social satire dealing with the question of whether behavioural psychology and psychological conditioning are dangerous weapons for a government to use to impose controls on its citizens and turn them into little more than robots”.
With a powerful message, great imagery and unique soundtrack, A Clockwork Orange is deserving of its revered status.
4. A Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974)
Tobe Hooper’s genre-defining ‘slash-terpiece’ was banned across continents. From Europe to Asia for its depiction of extreme violence, gore and sadistic content.
Many countries such as Iceland would only sanction the film if it was edited and censored. In 1976, two theatres in Ottawa, Canada were informed by local authorities that they may face morality charges’ unless they pulled the film.
Until 1999 the original uncut version in wasn’t shown in the UK due to its unsettling themes. According to the BBFC, “the film’s focus on ‘abnormal psychology’ was unsuitable for a BBFC X certificate to be issued”.
Yet, the film did slip through the cracks a decade later as the new medium of home video releases spared the film from formal certification. Back in circulation, the film established a cult status once again before being removed from shelves and banned once more in 1984.
Hooper’s tale of one farming family’s unconventional hosting skills was highly prised despite its repeated censorship. Noted by the revelation by the British censorship board, “the BBFC was impressed, rather than disturbed, by the film’s reliance on atmosphere rather than explicit violence, although it was accepted that the film still retained some of its power to shock and unsettle. Most importantly, unlike other films of the period, the film contained no element of sexual violence.”
Filming in a Texas heatwave, using real rotting animals on set and the cast experiencing real injuries from being hit with prop hammers to lacerations. This film almost borders on snuff. As we watch real people going through hell, creating a unique film.
5. The Great Dictator (1940)
Famous for being Charlie Chaplin’s first talking motion picture. The Great Dictator saw Chaplin write, direct and star in a satirical take on fascism and the rise of Adolf Hitler.
The film was banned by Nazi Germany (no surprises there). Plus, in numerous Latin American countries before its release in 1940.
This is arguably Chaplin’s greatest work, gifting the world a moving final monologue that is still as poignant today. “More than machinery we need humanity. More than cleverness we need kindness and gentleness.” A theme that runs through Chaplin’s work and presents itself during this final scene.
6. Monty Python’s Life of Brian (1979)
British comedy collective Monty Python’s controversial take on Christianity received banishment from many countries.
The UK’s Guardian newspaper reported that the Catholic church called The Life of Brian “blasphemy”. Adding it was a “crime against religion which holds the person of Christ up to comic ridicule.” Jewish groups were just as offended, describing the film as “grievously insulting,” and “a vicious attack on Judaism and the Bible.”
On a list of movies that were banned in Norway, Ireland, most of Britain and provoked protests outside cinemas in the US. Yet the controversy isn’t what solidified The Life of Brian as a classic.
Python made their name by inverting comedic tropes. Often interrupting their own sketches and breaking the fourth wall. But, The Life of Brian not only had a succinct ending, but it provided a satisfying comical crescendo with the musical crucifixion scene. Eric Idle’s, Always Look on the Bright Side of Life finale remains an iconic piece of British cinema. An uplifting end in poor taste.
7. Freaks (1938)
Tod Browning’s semi-autobiographical recounts his time travelling with a circus. It featured genuine sideshow talents. Including conjoined twins Daisy and Violet Hilton. Plus “human torso” Prince Randian.
It attempts to offer a sympathetic depiction of the carnival acts. yet the audiences and censors were horrified. MGM director Merrill Pye recalled that “Halfway through the preview, a lot of people got up and ran out.” A woman who attended the screening threatened to sue MGM, claiming the film had caused her to suffer a miscarriage.
The film was banned in the UK for over 30 years. It only survived in the US after being edited by a third and being preserved by the Library of Congress.
Its cult classic’ status has been achieved due to its compassionate portrait of diverse, counter-culture performers. As well as its influence on pop culture such as American Horror Story: Freak show.
By 1994, Freaks was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry. Which preserves “culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant” films.
8. The Exorcist (1974)
The Exorcist received mass protests against around the UK by the Nationwide Festival of Light. A Christian public action group concerned with the influence of media on society.
Members of the clergy and concerned citizens handed out leaflets to those queuing to see the film. They offered spiritual support following the screening. This is why it was one of the movies banned throughout parts of the UK, and remained prohibited for 11 years. The BBFC finally lifted the ban on the movie in 1999 after concluding that the film, “while still a powerful and compelling work, no longer had the same impact as it did 25 years ago”.
Whilst the landscape of horror may have changed, the subject matter of the film is still as effective. Losing control of ourselves, the inability to protect your children and the fear of unknown forces are fears deep-rooted at the human core. The Exorcist’s legacy was built from its controversy and survived by shaping the thriving genre of supernatural horror.
9. Reservoir Dogs (1993)
Quentin Tarantino’s brutal debut remains a must-see in the director’s portfolio. It’s been named the “Greatest Independent Film of all Time” by Empire magazine. Praised by critics and grossing $2.8 million despite its tiny budget. The film received even more popularity following Tarantino’s sophomore release Pulp Fiction (1994).
Intense, captivating and truly unique, Reservoir Dogs was an instant classic. Every scene is brimming with memorable moments and unpredictable action. From the often imitated opening credits, where the colour coded criminals walking in slow motion, to the brutal torcher sequence of Mr Blonde removing a policeman’s ear.
Ultimately, the use of violence and constant profanity resulted in the film being banned in the UK on home video until 1995. Following its cinematic release in ’93 VHS tapes were traded on the black market. In a desperate attempt to appear the bloodthirsty Tarantino fans, Reservoir Dogs saw a second cinematic release in 1994. It is perhaps the only banned film to be released in cinemas twice.
10. E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982)
Steven Spielberg’s loveable sci-fi maybe a family-friendly classic now. But officials in parts of Europe didn’t agree. The film was banned for audiences under-12 in Finland and Sweden where parents had to be present, strange to see for one of Spielberg’s movies. E.T. was believed to portray “adults as enemies of children” and therefore banned for the impressionable audience.
Regardless of the Norse exclusion, E.T managed to tap into that 1980’s blockbuster recipe. It depicts genuine human emotions in outlandish ways. Spielberg always states that E.T., the character, had its origins in an imaginary friend he created as a child, following his parents’ divorce. Yet he created the alien to resemble something unconventional instead of a cute, fuzzy companion.
By tapping into the lonely side of childhood and unique design of the main character, E.T transcended all censorship and became the friend of a generation.
Thanks for reading our article on 10 classic movies that were initially banned did we miss any obvious ones? Which are your favourites? Let us know in the comments below.
Read more on Reservoir Dogs in our Tarantino ranking article HERE.
Hogwarts Houses For MCU Characters
Since its conception, Hogwarts houses have been a deciding factor in getting to know people. How someone answers “what Hogwarts house are you in?” can tell you a lot about a person. But where do some of our favourite MCU characters shape up when faced with the sorting hat?
Tony Stark/Iron Man- Ravenclaw
While Tony could be argued for almost any of the houses, Ravenclaw suits him best. Most of his development comes from the pursuit of knowledge. Aside from being one of the smartest characters in the MCU, he is constantly learning and improving upon his technology. He tends to approach large problems from a strategic and pragmatic standpoint, especially in his later films. Admittedly he can be brave and somewhat self-servingly ambitious. But who he is at the end of his arc and the way that he solves problems points to Iron Man being in Ravenclaw.
Steve Rogers/Captain America- Gryffindor
Is it even a question? Steve Rogers is definitely a Gryffindor. From day one, he has always strived to do what’s right. And he subtly wants a bit of glory for it too. He’s a natural leader and has always rushed into danger without a thought. He is undoubtedly driven by bravery and righteousness and is through and through a Gryffindor.
Natasha Romanoff/Black Widow- Hufflepuff
Natasha is tricky. She could truthfully swing in any direction. It may seem strange to put a spy in Hufflepuff, but if nothing else, Natasha is loyal. She cares deeply for those close to her and has shown that she’s willing to die for them. Her characterization throughout the MCU has been lacking, but her solo film has shown her to be fiercely loyal.
Bruce Banner/The Hulk- Ravenclaw
Another Ravenclaw. Similar to Tony, Bruce is very intelligent. While he seems to be less inclined to want to fight battles than Tony is, he is constantly learning. His relationship with the Hulk can even be characterized this way. By a desire to learn how to control him, then to understand him, then to become him. His arc is one that is driven by knowledge.
Thor is always looking to prove himself. Even though he can lift the hammer, he is constantly looking for validation that he is worthy. He’s not usually afraid of much, and when he is, he faces it anyway. What makes Thor a Gryffindor though is his desire to be the hero. He’s not in Slytherin because he doesn’t desire to rule. He’s not ambitious, he just wants validation.
Peter Parker/Spiderman- Gryffindor
Peter is another hard one. He’s intelligent like Bruce and Tony, which could throw him into Ravenclaw. He’s loyal to his friends, which could put him into Hufflepuff. But at his core, Peter is in Gryffindor. The proof is in one of his first lines in the MCU. In Civil War, he tells Tony, “if you can do the things I do, and you don’t, then bad things happen because of you. (paraphrased)” He feels that because he’s special, he has to act. And unlike Steve and Thor, Peter is almost always afraid. He faces his challenges in spite of that. And while he wants to have a normal life, and a typical High School experience, he selflessly puts himself on the line. Once again, Peter is not looking for recognition, he’s just trying to do the right thing.
Dr Strange- Ravenclaw
Lots of Ravenclaws in the MCU. For Dr Strange, there really isn’t any other option. He is completely driven by the pursuit of knowledge. And while recognition came with that, we see with his journey into the mystic arts that his true motivation comes from learning. He’s a very similar character to Tony Stark, and both of them are textbook Ravenclaws.
Wanda Maximoff/Scarlet Witch- Hufflepuff
Like Natasha, Wanda is driven by her relationships. She is faithfully loyal to her brother, then Vision, then her family. She is definitely motivated to protect and care for those she loves. Including creating an entire alternate reality to be with them! Wanda is brave and intelligent, but at her core, she is loyal.
Finally, a Slytherin. Once again, was there any other option? Loki is characterized by his cunning and ambition. He wants to rule. And he doesn’t get there by rushing into battle. He gets there by being sneaky and clever. Loki is a Slytherin through and through.
Carol Danvers/Captain Marvel- Slytherin
This may not feel like the obvious choice for Carol, but she definitely portrays characteristics of a Slytherin. She’s the best, and she wants people to know it. She’s confident and clever, and she likes attention. We don’t know her very well yet, but from what we’ve seen, she seems to relish in the attention her efforts provide. She is good, helpful, and ambitious.
T’Challa/Black Panther- Hufflepuff
T’Challa is also driven by loyalty. But while he is protective of those he loves, his true loyalty is to Wakanda. He’s not king because of ambition, he’s king out of duty. Everything he does is through the lens of “what is best for Wakanda?” While it’s a bit unconventional, his loyalty to Wakanda characterizes him as a Hufflepuff.
Scott Lang/Ant-Man- Gryffindor
At first, it appears that Scott would be in Hufflepuff. After all, he is very motivated by his relationship with his daughter. But if he were truly 100% driven by that, he would have made different choices. He would not have betrayed Hope and Hank and teamed up with Captain America without their permission. He also would not have stolen from his company and landed in jail in the first place. But both of those above decisions do characterize him as a Gryffindor. He wants to be in the action, and he doesn’t always consider the consequences. Scott isn’t really looking for recognition and is not that ambitious, but he does want to be involved in the big events. He wants to help people, and he bravely faces battles. Sometimes without discretion.
Do you agree with our picks for these MCU characters in Hogwarts Houses? If not or if we’ve missed any out, leave us a comment below.
Check out our review of Black Widow HERE.
- Hogwarts Houses For MCU Characters July 23, 2021
- Harry Potter: The Questions You Keep Asking, Answered July 19, 2021
- Loki Episode 6 – Review July 15, 2021
- 9 Drummers That Became Lead Singers July 14, 2021
- Black Widow – Review July 10, 2021
- Movie News10 months ago
The 9 Most Powerful Power Rangers Villains
- Comics & Literature10 months ago
What Happened To The Fellowship After The Ring Was Destroyed?
- Movie News11 months ago
The Incredible Hulk Is The Best MCU Movie
- Movie News8 months ago
Which Traps Would Have Killed Harry And Marv In Home Alone?
- Movie News10 months ago
What Went Wrong? Hook
- Comics & Literature10 months ago
Harry Potter: The Tragic Life Of Remus Lupin
- TV News5 months ago
Homelander: The Greatest Villain In TV History
- TV News9 months ago
8 The Simpsons Characters Who Deserve Their Own Spin-Off